Fed’s Powell set to speak as economists fret about a policy mistake | World News
 "Jerome Powell, US Fed Chair")
The responses in the survey, which was released on Sunday, show the intense focus on the Fed as it eases monetary policy while hoping to both keep inflation on a steady decline back to its 2per cent target and avoid a significant additional rise in an unemployment rate that has been increasing modestly for a year. Photo: Bloomberg
A mistake by the US central bank in setting interest rates during the last phase of its inflation battle is the main risk that could undercut the economy over the next year, according to a new survey of economists released as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was set to speak on Monday.
Among 32 professional forecasters surveyed recently by the National Association for Business Economics, 39 per cent cited a “monetary policy mistake” as the “greatest downside risk to the US economy over the next 12 months.” By contrast, 23per cent regarded the outcome of the Nov. 5 US presidential election as the biggest downside risk and the same number cited an intensification of the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.
The responses in the survey, which was released on Sunday, show the intense focus on the Fed as it eases monetary policy while hoping to both keep inflation on a steady decline back to its 2 per cent target and avoid a significant additional rise in an unemployment rate that has been increasing modestly for a year.
Powell is scheduled to address the association at 12:55 p.m.
CDT (1755 GMT) in Nashville, Tennessee, and is expected to elaborate on the Fed’s decision to cut its benchmark interest rate by half a percentage point at its Sept. 17-18 meeting and on the considerations that will frame an expected series of reductions in borrowing costs over the rest of this year and in 2025.
The Fed is expected to cut rates again, either by a quarter or half of a percentage point, at its Nov. 6-7 policy meeting.
Overall risks to the economy are increasing, the association’s panel of economists indicated, with 55per cent saying it was more likely the economy would perform worse than expected than do better – with Fed policy topping the list of possible speed bumps.
As it stands, the panel at the median said US economic growth is expected to slow to 1.8per cent next year, from an estimated 2.6per cent this year, with the unemployment rate rising to 4.4per cent, from the current 4.2per cent, and inflation ending next year at 2.1per cent.
Two-thirds of respondents said they did not expect a recession until at least 2026.
‘JUST IN TIME’
Such results would likely be cheered by Powell and the Fed as a textbook “soft landing.” Inflation, as measured by the central bank’s preferred personal consumption expenditures price index, has fallen from a peak above 7per cent in 2022 to 2.2per cent last month without a recession or a sharp rise in the unemployment rate. While the jobless rate has risen to 4.2per cent from half-century lows last year of 3.4per cent, it remains well below the average of 5.7per cent recorded in Bureau of Labor Statistics data since the late 1940s.
But there’s broad disagreement about how to finish the job, highlighting concerns about the Fed’s ability to avoid either keeping borrowing costs and financial conditions too tight, and slowing the economy unnecessarily, or loosening so quickly that inflation rebounds.
While the median of the panel’s forecasters said the current policy rate is where it should be following the Fed’s recent rate cut, opinion was roughly split on that issue – with a majority feeling the central bank is already off track.
The rate move came “just in time,” 65per cent of the respondents said.
But only one-third of them believe the current policy rate is “just right,” while another third “believe the rate should be less than 4.75per cent and 30per cent believe it should be 5per cent or higher,” the survey showed.
Among other risks cited, respondents were divided over what election outcome posed the greater threat to the economy.
Having control of Congress and the White House in the hands of one party can make decision-making smoother on issues like lifting the debt ceiling or setting a budget, but can also give a president more leeway to act on campaign promises, such as tax cuts or trade policies.
As a negative risk, 13per cent said a Republican sweep of the White House and Congress would pose a threat, compared to 10per cent who felt that way about a Democratic sweep of the executive and legislative branches of government.
By contrast, 7per cent of respondents viewed a Democratic or Republican sweep in a positive light.
Divided government was seen as a downside risk by 17per cent of respondents and an upside risk by 13per cent.
First Published: Sep 30 2024 | 11:40 AM IST
